Balance in News reporting— is that an ultimate
objective?
It is an old dictum in journalism that you should strive for
balance in your reports. This was often interpreted to mean
that the journalists should give both sides of the story he or
she reported. The author remembers him being silenced at an
editorial conference by the News Editor in the eighties when
he tried to suggest that there could be more than two sides to
a story and doing a balancing act between two sides was not
sufficient. It was sometimes an inviolable principle.
Well,
the two-sides theory has its advantages. When resources are
limited, it helps to bring out a reasonably good report. Both
the sides will be generally satisfied though the wrong side
would be happier. For the newspaper, it often helps to avoid
criticism from interested sections of people as the Editor can
say that we have given both sides of the story.
However, in practice the reporting will hardly ever be
balanced. The reporter may give more importance to the version
he things is closer to the truth. He may also add his bias. If
he achieves perfect balance, the reader will be confused as to
what is the truth. The confusion will be compounded when it
comes to incidents such as communal riots.
Experienced reporters know that you will hear several versions
of even a simple accident if you ask around. The problem
becomes more compounded if the issue is complex. So, the best
option is to seek information from as many sources as possible
if time and resources permit. This may get you closer to truth
so that you can confidently ignore the other side.
However, times have changed with our having television
channels that do propaganda now. What will the others, if any,
do? We have seen old timer Rajdeep Sardesai attracting
criticism when he focussed on both sides of the story in
reporting Delhi riots (a better term may be targeted
violence). Well, the options are limited especially when you
are doing live reporting. You cannot really balance a story
because all facts about riots cannot be known. Besides, all
obtainable facts will not become available at the same time.
So, if you are on the side of truth, what you can do is to
counter propaganda. Alt News has done this in Delhi, often
making use of technical tools.
In a communal riot, you cannot please any side as truth will
hurt both sides. So several channels think that it is better
to have one on their side and do biased coverage. That helps
to keep their captive audience who hardly ever sees the other
side. (Algorithms of social media sites also do the same
thing. But the difference is that they maintain diverse
captive audiences, catering different content to different
audiences in tune with users’ tastes, interests and beliefs.)
Needless to say this is dangerous for the country and its
people. Truth needs to be told even when the rulers lie and
refuse to acknowledge facts. Let the lies be reported, and the
viewers told the truth; thus catering to both sides. But truth
needs no balancing act. Truth-telling is the soul of
journalism.
Roy Mathew
March 3, 2020